Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Movie Review: 'The Orphan' (1979)

By Ryan Clark

The Orphan is not a horror film, despite the "Friday the 13th" subtitle and the presence of a somewhat nasty knife murder late in the film. It's a psychological study of a young boy under the care of his controlling Aunt Martha following the accidental shooting of his father and the suicide of his mother. He idolizes his father, who was often absent while exploring Africa, so much that his memories of the man all have the tone of a 70s cologne commercial. The boy's aunt, while well-meaning, seems determined to strip away any remnants of the father's influence, including letting go of the black handyman who befriends the boy and tries to undo some of Aunt Martha's harm by teaching him about life in a manner in which his father would approve. The boy rebels against his aunt at every opportunity, even going as far as rejecting communion during mass and forming his own African-influenced religion, worshiping a gigantic gorilla statue (!) he keeps in the shed behind his house. Is he just a normal kid smothered by his overprotective aunt, or is he perhaps sicker than she thinks he is?

The Orphan, which was filmed under the title "Betrayal" and was based on a short story called "Sredni Vashtar" by Hector Hugh Munro, is one strange and enigmatic film. Production started in 1968 and lasted until the late 70s, and you can tell because the boy's hair changes in every scene. Mark Owens, who plays the orphan, is awkward in many scenes, but he's sometimes effective. Peggy Fuery is particularly good as the aunt, and Afolabi Ajayi, who died during filming, is a welcome and friendly presence in a film crowded with mostly cold characters.

Unfortunately, the film is also amateurish in terms of sound editing and cinematography, and its style is at first off-putting. Some films like The Last House on the Left benefit from the filmmakers' inexperience.  Not so with The Orphan, which is director John Ballard's first and only movie.  It really detracts from the power that an at least slightly more accomplished production would have had.  Many scenes were cut by the producers to bring down the running time, and one can't help but think that these scenes, as described in Stephen Thrower's wonderful book, Nightmare U.S.A., would have further expanded the intriguing and complex characterizations in this unique movie.

When I finished watching the film, my first thought was, "I like the frozen ravioli better than the frozen tortellini. I think I'll buy that from now on." My second thought was, "That was interesting, but I'll probably never watch it again." But you never know. A revisit may be in order somewhere down the line.


Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Tender and Perverse Jess: RIP Jesús Franco (1930 - 2013)



The sad news of Jess Franco's death has affected me more than I ever realized it could.  

Having seen close to forty of his films, I have experienced both the highs and the lows of Franco's cinematic odyssey.  When he was good, he was excellent.  There are images in films like Vampyros Lesbos, The Diabolical Dr. Z, and Exorcism that will stay with me forever.  When he was bad, he could be excruciating.  I can't foresee ever watching Oasis of the Zombies again.  

There's no doubt Franco was a filmmaker outside the realm of popular taste.  His films aren't for everyone, and that's what I love about them.  They are often daring, intensely personal, visually startling, and also, in Franco's mad rush to move on to the next film, careless at times.  But you know what?  That's okay.  He has a higher number of enjoyable movies in his filmography than most filmmakers.  The deaths of first Jean Rollin in 2010 and now Jess Franco mark the end of personal cinema.

If I believed in heaven or the afterlife, I would hope that dear Jess and Lina Romay, who passed away last year, are together once again.  Since I don't believe that, I cannot honestly say such a thing.  But they will always remain a couple on the screen, in our minds, and in our hearts.

Jess and Lina at the Offscreen Film Festival, 2010

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Movie Review: 'Succubus' (1967)

By Ryan Clark

There's no doubt that Succubus (original title: Necronomicon) is one of the most important films in Jess Franco's lengthy filmography.  In the United States, at least, it was perhaps his most successful theatrical release, profiting on the then-new X-rating and the luscious beauty of its exotic, oft-nude star, Janine Reynaud.  It's too bad, then, that Succubus is also one of his most boring and overrated films.

Only two sequences stand out as worthy of Franco's vast ouevre:  One is the opening S&M performance art piece in which Reynaud erotically tortures and kills a young couple who are strung up, bleeding, on wooden planks, clothes torn.  It is an image that will show up repeatedly in Franco's work, most notably in Exorcism.  The other is a sequence that may or may not be a dream, with Reynaud stabbing a blonde woman while surrounded by living mannequins that look like they're straight out of Tourist Trap

The rest of Succubus – boldly touted as "THE sensual experience of '69" – is a jumbled, incoherent endurance test.  The lush, hazy cinematography is wasted on a pretentious and nonsensical, dream-like mess.


I first saw Succubus several years ago, and it was one of the first Jess Franco films I had seen.  Needless to say, it wasn't a good place to start.  I thought my opinion would change after having seen over thirty of his films, but Succubus remains just as dull as ever.  It's one of those films that feels never-ending even though, at seventy-nine minutes, it is fairly short.

I can appreciate the importance of this film in allowing Franco to make the more personal, truly great ones which were to come later – Venus in Furs, Eugenie... The Story of Her Journey Into Perversion, She Killed in Ecstasy, and Vampyros Lesbos, to name a few – but on its own terms, Succubus simply... well, sucks.

Friday, January 25, 2013

Movie Review: 'Hide and Go Shriek' (1988)

By Ryan Clark

When you consider the quality of most late 80s slasher films, Hide and Go Shriek really isn't that bad.  Compared to just about any other kind of movie, though... yes, it really is that bad.  Occasionally there are miniscule glimpses of originality, but mostly the film is there to be laughed at, even if that wasn't the intention of the filmmakers (but I suspect maybe it was).  Hide and Go Shriek revels in everything that made the late 80s and early 90s the most cringe-worthy period of American history:  the fashion, the music, the HAIR!!  It's also pretty damn stupid, but that goes without saying. 

Four obnoxious, young couples stay overnight in a furniture store to have sex.  They end up talking and playing hide and seek more than getting laid (I think they're a little bit retarded), and are eventually slaughtered by a kinky killer who dons the clothing of his victims, including women, to lure their partners so he can close in.  Apparently, he would rather be playing dress up than entertaining us by killing teenagers, because he spends much of the film running around, wearing a big 80s wig and a skirt, and giggling like a schoolgirl.  The remaining, clearly sheltered children are a tad bewildered when, in the end, he turns out to be an extra from the film Cruising.
 

Everything about this movie is awful – the acting, the dialogue, the pacing (which is especially offensive, because it was directed by an editor) – yet it held my interest despite its deficiencies.  Some of the deaths are suitably nasty, including a moderately disturbing elevator decapitation, but it's too little too late due to the sheer amount of horsing around we must endure before we get to the red stuff.  If the kids were even halfway likable, as they are in Final Exam, the wait would be more tolerable.  Still, the fact that Hide and Go Shriek is a watchable and fairly entertaining late 80s slasher is quite a feat in itself.  If that is what you seek, you could do a hellllllll of a lot worse.

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Movie Review: 'Crazed' (1982)

By Ryan Clark

Once in a while you watch a horror film that feels like it doesn't quite belong in the genre it got shackled to.  There's something more to Crazed, also known as Bloodshed and Slipping Into Darkness, than simply the need to shock and horrify.  It's a story we've all seen before, but never quite this way and with such a dark, repressive atmosphere.  The little details are what make Crazed so special, and its undeserved obscurity must be rectified.

Karen (Beverly Ross) leaves her boyfriend and his farm and moves into the city to become a writer.  She meets a few bizarre, potential landlords while looking for an apartment, before finally settling on a room in a house owned by an eccentric, mildly obnoxious, but basically nice old lady (Belle Mitchell).  The only other tenant is Grahame (Laszlo Papas), a quiet young man who helps the old woman, who claims she cannot climb the stairs and hasn't been on the second floor in twenty years, with chores and errands.  Karen finds Grahame and his mumbling about government conspiracies annoying, but she is happy with her room and keeps in touch with her ex-boyfriend, who tries to woo her back.  She attends a creative writing course taught by a loud, pretentious professor and befriends a classmate who wants her to critique his writing – and, inevitably, his performance in bed.   Meanwhile, Grahame is spying on Karen through the ventilation grill between their rooms.  He tries asking her out; forcing himself on her when she rebuffs him, but stops himself out of guilt.  He has problems with sex – it is suggested via flashbacks, shown during his visit with a hooker, that he was molested as a child by both a priest and his foster father (!) – and doesn't want to defile her.  When Karen unexpectedly drowns in the bathtub, Grahame keeps her body in his room.  Eventually, Karen's boyfriend and classmate begin to get suspicious, and the old lady asks Grahame to find the source of that awful smell...

Crazed is, of course, very predictable, having been preceded by Psycho and The Killing Kind and followed by Silent Scream and Crawlspace.  With the exception of Psycho, it's a good deal better than all of them, even if nothing scary happens until halfway through the movie.  The film takes its time developing the characters and has a compassion for them that's rare in this genre.  The quirky details – like the fact that Karen is a diabetic and prone to seizures – make you feel like you really know them, so that when the shit hits the fan, you're utterly engrossed and on the edge of your seat.  You could argue there's too much of a focus on character and it slows the story down, and you would be right, but there's nothing wrong with that.  "Slow" does not mean "boring".  If there's a true flaw, it's that the uneven score can ruin the mood by being inappropriately jaunty at times.

Shot in 1977 as The Paranoiac and released theatrically by Jupiter Pictures in 1979 under the title Slipping Into Darkness, it would appear on tape in the 80s as Crazed (from Trans World Entertainment), Bloodshed (with wonderfully trashy artwork from Regal Video that had nothing whatsoever to do with the film), and Slipping Into Darkness (Genesis Home Video).  I'm not sure where the 1982 release year came from, but it has stuck, so I've decided to use that for the sake of identification since multiple films have been released under those three titles.  (I've also picked Crazed as the title of choice, because the Trans World VHS release was first and that's what it is known as on IMDb.)  Crazed has never been available legitimately on DVD, and it remains unknown outside of a very select group of adventurous horror fans.  It would be a dream if a company like Code Red or Scorpion Releasing could release this on DVD and widen its audience – are you listening, guys?

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Ryan's Top Five of 2012 List

By Ryan Clark

I'd do a top ten, but I really haven't seen that many new movies this year, and it wouldn't be fair to list ones that I thought were just okay.  So I'm doing a top five, and hopefully next year I will have seen enough new movies to form a top ten.
 

5. SOUND OF MY VOICE

This unnerving mood piece about an enigmatic cult leader who claims to be from the future sounds like it would be riddled with cliches.  It's not.  It isn't perfect, but it is unique enough to stand out amongst other thrillers and dramas about creepy cults.  In the end, I found it to be wholly absorbing, if a bit unsatisfying.
 
  
4. COMPLIANCE

Follows almost too closely the horrifying true story of a fast food worker who was sexually harassed by her boss because of a prank caller who says that he's a cop.  Because of its ultra-realism, the movie certainly does drag in places, but the tension never lets up even when you know what's going to happen.  Many people were angered by this film and refused to accept that these unbelievable events actually took place, but that doesn't change the fact that it did happen.
 

3. EXCISION

Traci Lords is very impressive as the mother of a deranged, socially awkward high school girl with terrible complexion who wants to be a surgeon.  This is often labeled as a horror film, but it's really more of a drama despite some freakish elements and gory dream sequences. The film deals with the strained mother-daughter relationship in a surprisingly dimensional way.
 

2. KILLER JOE

I've never been more uncomfortable at the movies than when I saw Killer Joe – and I mean that in the best possible way.  Matthew McConaughey gives a career-best performance as the title character, a suave and mysterious hitman with a taste for young girls.  This film is so wildly sleazy that it made me want to go home and take another shower, but I didn't want to take my eyes off the screen.  I can't remember the last time I squirmed so much in a theater – The Devil's Rejects, perhaps – but all I know is I want it to happen more often.  One thing is for sure:  I will never look at KFC the same way again.
 
  
1. GOD BLESS AMERICA

I was tempted to make Killer Joe my top pick of the year, but this one is just too damn fun to not be my favorite.  I honestly haven't seen a film that aligned more with my politics and what disgusts me in this world.  The dialogue gets a bit too preachy at times, but I think the only thing I really disagreed with was the lead character's condemnation of Woody Allen.  Still, how can I not love a film that so successfully satirizes everything that is wrong with America and graphically displays my every fantasy as an American Idol and reality show hater?